IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION (TR) No.1129 OF 2017 Date: 15.04.2026 Between:

S.S.R. Anjaneyulu.

…Petitioner AND The State of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Department.

…Respondent

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II appearing for the respondent.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is questioning the impugned G.O.Ms.No.426, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (VIG.IA) Department, dated 17.10.2013, through which sanction was given by the Government to initiate departmental proceedings against the petitioner under Rule 9 (2) (b) and (i) of Revised Pension Rules, 1980 and the consequential G.O.Rt.No.1620 dated 17.10.2013 through which the sole charge had been framed against the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that prior to the petitioner’s retirement vide memo dated 28.06.2013, the petitioner was asked to explain with regard to the alleged two contrary reports. In response to the same, the petitioner submitted his deta