IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH Date:27.04.2026 Between:

Sk. Janimiya.

…Petitioner.

And State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home department) Hyderabad and others.

...Respondents.

ORDER:

H [

Heard Sri G. Ravi Chandrasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-Home for the respondents.

2. This writ petition is filed questioning the order passed by the respondent No.4 in Rc.No.A6/APP/3078/2022-23 dated 17.02.2023 confirming the order passed by the respondent No.3 in Proceedings No.C.No.75/PR/A6/2016 dated 11.01.2017 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the said orders by directing the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith with all consequential benefits including back wages, continuity of service along with increments and other monetary benefits.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Police Constable on 01.02.2012 at 12^th Battalion APSP, Nalgonda and his service was regularized on 12.02.2014. Basing on the complaint dated 12.06.2016, a case was registered against the pet