SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 15617

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO


CRIMINAL PETITION No.6738 of 2026


Date:29.04.2026


Between:

Dondeti Venkateshwarlu

...petitioner/accused

AND

The State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor,

High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad and another.

...respondents

ORDER

This Criminal Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1040 of 2020, on the file of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam, wherein the petitioner was arrayed as accused, for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 384 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’).

2. Heard Mr. V. Venu Madhav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for respondent No.1.

3. Though the criminal petition was filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1040 of 2020, when this Court expressed a view that all the grounds which are raised by the petitioner are disputed facts and the same have to be decided by the trial Court after full-fledged trial. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to dispense with the appearance of the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.1040 of 2020, on the file of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam, on the ground that the petitioner is aged about 64 years, suffering with old aged ailments. Hence, it is very difficult for the petitioner to appear on each and every date of adjournment in the Trial Court, as such the learned counsel sought for dispensing with the presence of petitioner before the Trial Court.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has not opposed the submission made by the learned counsel for petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and also submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the presence of the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.1040 of 2020, on the file of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam, is dispensed with, subject to the condition that the petitioner/accused shall be represented by his counsel on every date of hearing, unless his presence is specifically required during the course of the trial. In the event of non-appearance of petitioner/accused on any date so fixed by the trial Court, the trial Court shall be entitled to proceed with the matter in accordance with law.

6. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top