IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
Ryagatla Mallesham – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 956/2019
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No. 956 of 2019
DATE: 28.04.2026
Between:
Ryagatla Mallesham
...Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Represented by its Principal Secretary,
Department of Medical & Health,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and 4 others.
…Respondents
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the action of respondents
No.2 to 4 in selecting candidates for the post of Lab Technicians
without following the roster as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present Writ Petition are
that the respondent authorities issued a notification dated 04.04.2017
calling for applications for the post of Lab Technicians in Siddipet
District and the last date for receipt of applications was 17.10.2017. It
is further submitted that the petitioner applied for the said post and, as
##PAGE2##TMD,J
WP_956_2019
2
per his educational qualifications, he was awarded 54.33% marks. It
is submitted that seven candidates were selected. Though the
respondents had called only 101 candidates for interview and the
petitioner was placed at Sl.No.101, his name did not find place in the
list of selected candidates, but a candidate who was placed at
Sl.No.162, i.e., unofficial respondent No.5, was selected. According
to the petitioner, respondents No.2 to 4 have not followed the roster
properly and have not followed the selection process correctly and
have selected respondent No.5. Therefore, the present Writ Petition
has been filed.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing for the
respondents, has referred to the averments made in the counter
affidavit and submitted that the petitioner did not secure any marks in
the interview, whereas respondent No.5 secured 20 marks. Therefore,
according to him, respondent No.5 obtained more marks than the
petitioner and hence was selected and appointed and is presently
discharging his duties.
4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 submitted that
marks were awarded to the candidates based on educational
##PAGE3##TMD,J
WP_956_2019
3
qualifications, experience, and performance in the interview. He
submitted that since respondent No.5 secured more marks than the
petitioner, his selection was justified. It is further submitted that there
has been no challenge to the manner in which the interview was
conducted or the marks were awarded to the candidates. Therefore,
the petitioner cannot now raise grounds about the interview not being
conducted in a proper manner.
5. Having regard to the rival contentions and the material on
record, this Court finds that the petitioner has challenged the
appointment of respondent No.5 only on the ground that he secured
lesser marks than the petitioner in terms of educational qualifications
and experience. However, it is noticed that respondent No.5 secured
more marks in the interview i.e., 20 marks, whereas the petitioner
secured 0 marks. The petitioner has not challenged the procedure
adopted by the respondents in awarding marks in the interview.
Further, it is also noticed that there are other candidates who have
secured more marks than the petitioner in both educational
qualifications and interview. Without there being any challenge to the
awarding of marks in the interview, the petitioner cannot now take
ground that he is more meritorious than the selected candidates.
##PAGE4##TMD,J
WP_956_2019
4
6. In view of the above, this Court does not find any merit in the
Writ Petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, this
Court had directed the respondents to get instructions as to whether
there are any existing vacancies for the post of Lab Technicians. Both
the respondents and the learned counsel for the petitioner, based on
information obtained under the Right to Information Act, submitted
that the Commissioner of Health and Family Welfare & Mission
Director, National Health Mission, Telangana, has issued instructions
to stop filling up vacancies under the National Health Mission in the
districts until further
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.