SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 15741

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Gunje Papanna – Appellant
Versus
Gunje Venkati – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.855 of 2020 DATE: 30.04.2026 Between Gunje Papanna …Petitioner AND Gunje Venkati …Respondent

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 12.09.2019 passed in C.M.A. No. 20 of 2017 by the learned VIII Additional District Judge. Nizamabad, whereby the appellate Court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order dated 11.08.2017 passed in I.A.No.04 of 2017 in O.S. No. 01 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Armoor, granting temporary injunction in favour of the respondent/plaintiff.

2. Heard Sri R. Sushanth Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the entire material on record.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to, as they are arrayed before the Trial Court.

4. The brief facts of the case are that plaintiff filed O.S.No.01 of 2017 seeking perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top