SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 16272

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. Shravan Kumar, J
Peddala Mallesham – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.8436 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sannidhiraja Malleswara Rao
For the Respondents: Srinivasa Rao Pachwa

Unauthorized constructions made in deviation of sanctioned plans, especially after valid cut-off dates, cannot be regularized, and courts should decline to exercise equitable jurisdiction to protect such illegal structures to uphold town planning laws and urban order.

Headnote:(A) GHMC Act, 1956 - Section 455-AA - Regularization of unauthorized construction - Building permit granted in 2024 for ground plus one floor - Second floor and pent house constructed without sanction - Application for regularization of post-cut-off date (28.10.2015) construction rejected - Court emphasized compliance with master plans and discouraged compounding of deliberate deviations in sanctioned plans. (Paras 11, 13, 16)

(B) Writ Petition - Scope of judicial discretion in unauthorized constructions - Courts refrain from exercising equitable jurisdiction to regularize illegal buildings as it encourages violation of planning laws and principles laid down by the Supreme Court. (Paras 14, 15, 18)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, owners of the subject property, obtained building permission in 2024 for a ground plus one floor structure. They subsequently constructed a second floor and a pent house without authorization and applied for regularization under Section 455-AA of the GHMC Act. The present petition seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to consider their representation for regularization and commercial conversion of the ground floor.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the construction was undertaken after the cut-off date of 28.10.2015, making it ineligible for regularization under Section 455-AA. Following established Supreme Court precedents, the Court declined to grant relief, directing the authorities to pass orders in accordance with the law.

Issues: Whether the unauthorized construction of a second floor and pent house undertaken after the 2015 cut-off date is eligible for regularization, and whether the Court should direct the conversion of residential premises to commercial use.

Ratio Decidendi: Unauthorized constructions made in deviation of sanctioned plans, especially after the prescribed cut-off date, cannot be regularized or compounded, and judicial discretion cannot be exercised to condone deliberate illegality, as it compromises planned urban development.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions to authorities to pass orders according to law.

Table of Content
1. factual background involving unauthorized modifications to residential property. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. inapplicability of regularization provisions under the ghmc act for post-cutoff constructions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
3. judicial stance against regularizing illegal constructions and deviations. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. final order directing statutory authorities to decide according to law. (Para 20)

:: ORDER ::

This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:-

“…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature

of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 4th respondent in not

considering the representation dated 23.02.2026 of the petitioners and

not granting permission for conversion of the ground floor for

commercial purposes and further not regularizing the second floor and

pent house on the premises i.e. the house H.No.13-11-17, Plot No.10, P

and T Colony, Gaddiannaram, Survey Nos. 222, 223, 253, 254, 256

and 257 Parts, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District belonging

to the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Articles 14, 21

and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the

respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider the representation dated 23.02.2026

of the petitioners and grant permission for conversion, of the ground

floor for commercial purposes and further regularize the second floor

and pent house on the premises i.e. the house H.No.13-11-17, Plot

No.10, P and T Colony, Gaddiannaram, Survey Nos. 222, 223, 253,

254, 256 and 257 Parts, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,

belonging to the petitioners, in the interest of justice.”

2. Heard Sri Sannidhiraja Malleswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 6. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

3. The brief facts of the case as stated are that, the petitioners claims to be the absolute and joint owners and possessors of the house bearing No.13-11-17, Plot No.10, P & T Colony, in Survey Nos.222, 223, 253, 254, 256 and 257 Parts, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred as “subject property”). The petitioners have obtained building permission for construction of ground floor plus one upper floor vide TG-bPASS – Building Permit Order dated 19.08.2024 granted by respondent No.4. Accordingly, the construction was carried out as per the Commencement Letter dated 14.11.2024. The petitioners have also constructed a second floor and pent house unauthorizedly due to ignorance of law. The petitioners submits that they are eligible for regularization of unauthorized construction as per the provisions under Section 455-AA of the GHMC, Act. The petitioners submits that they are senior citizens and have invested their hard earned money for construction of the house and as they do not have any other source of income, would like to lease out the ground floor for commercial property. As such, the ground floor needs to be converted into commercial purposes by the respondent authorities. It is further submitted that the subject property is situated at a commercial zone and the said ground floor is safe and fit for commercial use.

4. The petitioners made a representation on 23.02.2026 to respondent No.4 requesting to grant permission for conversion of the ground floor for commercial purpose and further regularize the second floor and pent house on the premises. Since the petitioners’ representation is pending. Questioning the pending consideration, the present writ petition is filed.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that earlier, the petitioner No.1 had filed W.P.No.35161 of 2024 questioning the action of respondent No.3/the Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Circle-5, Saroornagar, Rangareddy District, in interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful and authorized construction by issuing the Impugned Show Cause N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top