SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 16826

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Arun Kumar Dama – Appellant
Versus
Madi Ram Reddy – Respondent


Between:

1.Arun Kumar Dama and another

… Petitioners–Petitioners–Defendant Nos.8 & 9

And

1. Madi Ram Reddy

… Respondent No.1 – Respondent No.1 – Plaintiff

2. Madi Yadi Reddy and six others

… Respondent Nos.2 to 8 – Respondent Nos. 2 to 8 – Defendant Nos.1 to 7

ORDER

1. This Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Chevella, Ranga Reddy District in I.A.No.158 of 2023 in O.S.No.54 of 2008, dated 12.09.2023.

2. Petitioners are the petitioners-defendant Nos.8 and 9, respondent No.1 is the respondent No.1-plaintiff and respondent Nos.2 to 8 are the respondent Nos.2 to 8 - defendant Nos.1 to 7 in I.A.No.158 of 2023 in O.S.No.54 of 2008.

3. For the sake of convenience, parties will be hereinafter referred to as petitioners – defendant Nos.8 and 9, respondent No.1 – plaintiff and respondent Nos.2 to 8 – defendant Nos.1 to 7.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners – defendant Nos.8 and 9 submits that the learned Trial Court ought to have considered the well-settled principle of law that a plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC if the relief claimed th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top