IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD
* * *
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos. 13483 OF 2025 & 5636 OF 2024
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13483 OF 2025
Between:
Lt. Col. M.S. Raju (Retd.), S/o. Late M. Narayana Raju, Aged about 75
years, Occu: Retd. Defence Personnel, R/o. 32, Shanti Vihar, Near
Green Park Enclave, Kapra Medchal Malkajgiri District.
Petitioner/De facto complainant
VERSUS
The State of Telangana, Represented by their Public Prosecutor, High
Court Building, Hyderabad, and seven others.
Respondents
&
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5636 OF 2024
Between:
M/s. Central Bank of India, Represented by its Managing Director,
Having its Registered Office at Chandermukhi, Nariman Point, Mumbai,
and another.
Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 and 2
VERSUS
The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High
Court of Telangana, Hyderabad, and another.
Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI
ORDER PRONOUNCED ON: 05.05.2026
! Counsel for the petitioner/s : Mr. K.Mohan, learned counsel
for the petitioner in Crl.P.No.13483 of
2025 and respondent No.2 in
Crl.P.No. 5636 of 2024.
^Counsel for respondents : Mr. T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy,
Learned Senior Counsel, argued on
behalf of Mr. T. Anirudh Reddy,
learned counsel for the petitioners in
Crl.P.No. 5636 of 2024 and
respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in Crl.P.No.
13483 of 2025;
M.Vivekananda Reddy, learned
Assistant Public Prosecutor,
appearing for respondent-State.
<GIST:
> HEAD NOTE:
? Cases referred
Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221;
G. Narasimhan v. T.V. Chokkappa, (1972 AIR 2609);
Mehmood Ul Rehman v. Khazir Mohammad Tunda, (2015) 12 SCC 420;
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate, (1998) 5 SCC 749;
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992 Supp (1) SCC 335).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.