IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
Kampati Sathyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and 3 others – Respondent
WP 24371/2022
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO.24371 OF 2022
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.24818 OF 2022
DATED : 21.05.2026
W.P.NO.24371 OF 2022
Between:
Kampati Sathyanarayana and others
... Petitioners
AND
The State of Telangana, rep. by its
Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept.,
T.S.Secretariat, Hyderabad and others
... Respondents
COMMON ORDER
In both these Writ Petitions, the petitioners were all appointed as
Village Revenue Assistants (VRAs) as per T.S. Village Revenue
Assistants Service Rules, 2005 issued under the proviso to Article 309
##PAGE2##W.P.Nos.24371 & 24818 of 2022
2
of the Constitution of India. They were all appointed after following the
due process during the years 2006 to 2010 and as per Rule 5 of the said
Rules, the Tahsildar shall be the appointing authority.
2. It is submitted by the petitioners that on 20.06.2020, final
seniority list of Village Revenue Assistants of the erstwhile
Kothagudem Division was prepared after inviting objections to the
provisional seniority list and therefore, the said list has become final.
The names of the petitioners were shown in the said list and thereafter,
the Unit Head, i.e., Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), who is
competent to effect promotions to the post of Office Subordinate in the
Revenue Division, addressed a letter to the District Collector, Bhadradri
Kothagudem on 21.07.2020 for permission to effect promotions in
respect of Paloncha Revenue Division and Kothagudem Revenue
Divsion. On 22.09.2021, the District Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem
replied stating that since the RDO is the Unit Officer, he shall take
further action and accordingly, the RDO after taking into consideration
the vacancy position, issued promotion orders on 01.10.2021 in
Rc.NoA/379/2019-I to 27 Village Revenue Assistants (which included
the petitioners) as Office Subordinates and Chainmen and the petitioners
and others were asked to report before the RDO, Mahabubabad. It
##PAGE3##W.P.Nos.24371 & 24818 of 2022
3
appears that the RDO, Mahabubabad did not accept the petitioners
reporting to duty. It is submitted that from October, 2021 to 06.02.2022
the petitioners continued as Office Subordinates and Chainmen.
Thereafter, the District Collector, Bhgadradri Kothagudem cancelled the
promotion orders on 06.02.2022 unilaterally without any notice.
Thereafter, on 01.04.2022, show-cause notices were issued to all the
petitioners with same contents giving the same reasons which were
mentioned in the earlier impugned orders and required the petitioners to
submit their replies for cancellation of the promotion orders. The
petitioners were also required to appear before the 2nd respondent on
04.04.2022 and submit their replies. Challenging the orders of
cancellation of promotions dt. 06.02.2022 and also the final proceedings
of the 2nd respondent dt.27.05.2022, these two Writ Petitions are filed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this
Court to the final seniority list filed along with the Writ Petitions to
demonstrate that the names of the petitioners are mentioned in the said
final seniority list dt.20.06.2020 and submitted that promotions have
been given in accordance with the said seniority list. He submitted that
without giving any notice to the petitioners, the orders dt.06.02.2022
were passed cancelling the promotions and thereafter, a show-cause
##PAGE4##W.P.Nos.24371 & 24818 of 2022
4
notice dt.01.04.2022 was issued and without considering the
explanations/submissions of the petitioners in proper perspective, the
final orders dt.27.05.2022 were passed. Therefore, according to him, the
respondents are not right in cancelling the promotions granted to the
petitioners herein.
4. Respondent No.2 has filed counter affidavit along with stay
vacate petition in I.A.No.4 of 2022. It is stated that after preparation of
final seniority list on 20.06.2020, there was a gap of more than one year
for issuance of promotions on 01.10.2021 which was contrary to the
Rules and t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.