2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 17104
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
PITTALA MUTYALU – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 16686/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN
WRIT PETITION No.16686 OF 2026
DATE: 14.05.2026
BETWEEN:
Pittala Mutyalu
….Petitioner
AND
State of Telangana rep. by its
Secretary, Revenue Department,
Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Bhavan,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others
….Respondents
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the
nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents
No.2 to 4 in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his agricultural
assigned land in Survey No.244/104 admeasuring Ac.1-20 Guntas
situated at Pedda Amberpet Village Abdullapurmet Mandal Ranga
Reddy District pending consideration of issuance of ePassbook in favour
of the petitioner covered by the orders of this Honble Court dated
10.02.2026 passed in W.P.No.4408 of 2026 without issuing any notice
and without following the procedure established by law as illegal
arbitrary against the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act
2013 and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and
against all settled principles of law and consequently direct the
respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the agricultural
assigned land in Survey No244/104 admeasuring Ac.1-20 gts. situated at
Pedda Amberpet Village Abdullapurmet Mandal Ranga Reddy District
and to pass…”
##PAGE2##2
2. Heard Sri Akkam Eshwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the
respondents and perused the material on record.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
is in lawful possession of the subject property comprising an extent of
Ac.1-20 gts. in Sy.No.244/104 situated at Pedda Amberpet Village,
Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, since the year 1980. The
learned counsel further submits that although the petitioner has been
in possession and cultivating the said property for decades and though
his name appears in old revenue records, the petitioner has not received
a new e-passbook under the Bhu Bharathi System. The learned counsel
for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed an online application
on 23.01.2026 for issuance of e-passbook. Upon inaction of the revenue
authorities, the petitioner filed W.P.No.4008 of 2026 which was
disposed of by this Court vide order dated 10.02.2026 directing the
revenue officials to consider the online Bhu Bharathi application made
by the petitioner herein in accordance with law within a period of sixty
(60) days.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the
said order of this Court in W.P.No.4008 of 2026 has not been complied
with. The learned counsel further submits that while the e-passbook
application of the petitioner is pending, the Government is trying to allot
##PAGE3##3
the subject land for the purpose of establishment of a Traffic Police
Station without any notice to the petitioner, without payment of
compensation for the subject property and without complying with the
statutory process. Learned counsel prays that the respondents be
restrained from dispossessing the petitioner from the subject property
pending the decision on his e-passbook application.
5. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on the
other hand, on the basis of written instructions issued by respondent
No.4-Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet Mandal submits that as per the Sessala
Pahani for the year 1955-58, the entire land in Sy.No.244 admeasuring
Ac.180.15 gts. is classified and recorded as “Gairan Sarkari”. The
learned Assistant Government Pleader for revenue further submits that,
upon verification, it was noticed that the assignees (landless poor) in
respect of an extent of Ac.39-36 gts. in sy.No.244 had contravened the
terms of the Assignment Rules, and therefore, the then Deputy Collector
and Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal resume