SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 17104

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
PITTALA MUTYALU – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 16686/2026



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN

WRIT PETITION No.16686 OF 2026

DATE: 14.05.2026

BETWEEN:

Pittala Mutyalu

….Petitioner

AND

State of Telangana rep. by its

Secretary, Revenue Department,

Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Bhavan,

Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others

….Respondents

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the

nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents

No.2 to 4 in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his agricultural

assigned land in Survey No.244/104 admeasuring Ac.1-20 Guntas

situated at Pedda Amberpet Village Abdullapurmet Mandal Ranga

Reddy District pending consideration of issuance of ePassbook in favour

of the petitioner covered by the orders of this Honble Court dated

10.02.2026 passed in W.P.No.4408 of 2026 without issuing any notice

and without following the procedure established by law as illegal

arbitrary against the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and

Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act

2013 and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and

against all settled principles of law and consequently direct the

respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the agricultural

assigned land in Survey No244/104 admeasuring Ac.1-20 gts. situated at

Pedda Amberpet Village Abdullapurmet Mandal Ranga Reddy District

and to pass…”

##PAGE2##

2

2. Heard Sri Akkam Eshwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the

respondents and perused the material on record.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

is in lawful possession of the subject property comprising an extent of

Ac.1-20 gts. in Sy.No.244/104 situated at Pedda Amberpet Village,

Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, since the year 1980. The

learned counsel further submits that although the petitioner has been

in possession and cultivating the said property for decades and though

his name appears in old revenue records, the petitioner has not received

a new e-passbook under the Bhu Bharathi System. The learned counsel

for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed an online application

on 23.01.2026 for issuance of e-passbook. Upon inaction of the revenue

authorities, the petitioner filed W.P.No.4008 of 2026 which was

disposed of by this Court vide order dated 10.02.2026 directing the

revenue officials to consider the online Bhu Bharathi application made

by the petitioner herein in accordance with law within a period of sixty

(60) days.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the

said order of this Court in W.P.No.4008 of 2026 has not been complied

with. The learned counsel further submits that while the e-passbook

application of the petitioner is pending, the Government is trying to allot

##PAGE3##

3

the subject land for the purpose of establishment of a Traffic Police

Station without any notice to the petitioner, without payment of

compensation for the subject property and without complying with the

statutory process. Learned counsel prays that the respondents be

restrained from dispossessing the petitioner from the subject property

pending the decision on his e-passbook application.

5. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on the

other hand, on the basis of written instructions issued by respondent

No.4-Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet Mandal submits that as per the Sessala

Pahani for the year 1955-58, the entire land in Sy.No.244 admeasuring

Ac.180.15 gts. is classified and recorded as “Gairan Sarkari”. The

learned Assistant Government Pleader for revenue further submits that,

upon verification, it was noticed that the assignees (landless poor) in

respect of an extent of Ac.39-36 gts. in sy.No.244 had contravened the

terms of the Assignment Rules, and therefore, the then Deputy Collector

and Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal resume

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top