SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 17115

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Surepalli Nanda, J
Amistapur Jama Masjid – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.16050 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mohammad Imthiyaz Pasha
For the Respondents: Government Pleader for Revenue, Government Pleader for Home, Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, Farhan Azam Khan

The court held that encroachment upon notified Waqf property for public works must follow due process of law and principles of natural justice, requiring authorities to consider representations and provide personal hearings, especially when dealing with sensitive religious sites like burial grounds.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in attempting to encroach upon notified Waqf graveyard land in Survey No. 521/9, admeasuring Ac. 0.12 Guntas, as illegal and void, alleging that such action was taken without following due process of law or issuing notice under Section 91 of the Waqf Act, 1995. The petitioner contended that the land has been used as a burial ground for over 150 years and is a notified Waqf property. The court observed that a detailed representation had been submitted by the petitioner objecting to the laying of a road through the graveyard. The primary issue was whether the respondents could proceed with road construction on notified Waqf property without adhering to the statutory requirements of the Waqf Act, 1995. The court reasoned that given the sensitive nature of the issue concerning a burial ground in existence for over 150 years, the grievance must be addressed in accordance with the law and the principles of natural justice, including the provision of a personal hearing. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner, as put forth vide petitioner’s representation dated 13.04.2026 addressed to respondent No. 2 herein pertaining to the request of the petitioner not to proceed with the laying of road burying old Muslim Graveyard (Cemetery) in Amistapur Village, Mahabubnagar located in Sy.No.521/ 9, Ac.0.12 guntas, in accordance to law , in conformity with the principles of natural justice, by providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, duly taking into consideration the vital fact that the subject issue is a sensitive issue concerning a burial ground which is in existence for more than 150 years, which is being used continuously by the Muslim Community and pass appropriate orders within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and duly communicate the decision on the petitioner’s representation dated 13.04.2026 to the petitioner herein.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks protection of notified waqf graveyard from encroachment for road construction without statutory notice. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. the necessity of considering the religious, cultural, and historical significance of a burial ground before executing public works. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. direction to resolve grievances via natural justice and maintain status quo on sensitive religious land. (Para 7)

ORDER

Head Sri Mohammad I mthiyaz Pasha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 4, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.5 and 6, learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings appearing on behalf of respondent No.7 and Sri Farhan Azam Khan, learned Standing Counsel for Waqf Board appearing on behalf of the respondent No.8.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“to issue a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction:

a) Declare the action of the Respondents in interfering with and attempting to encroach upon the notified Waqf graveyard land situated in Survey No. 521/9, admeasuring Ac. 0.12 Guntas at Amistapur Village, Bhoothpur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, within the limits of Amistapur Municipality without following due process of law and without issuing notice under Section 91 of the Waqf Act, 1995, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and void;

b) Direct the Respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession, management and religious use of the said graveyard property;

c) Direct the Respondent Police Authorities, particularly Respondent Nos. 5 & 6, not to assist, aid or use force in dispossessing the Petitioner or interfering with the said Waqf property, except in accordance with law;

d) Direct the Respondents to refrain from undertaking any road work, construction activity or use of machinery in the subject land;

e) Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

3. The case of the petitioner in brief as per the averments made in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the present Writ Petition is as under:-

i) The subject property admeasuring Ac.0.12 guntas situated in Sy. No.521/9, at Amistapur Village, Bhoothpur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, is a notified Waqf graveyard (Khabrastan) existing for more than 150 years and is continuously being used by the local Muslim community for burial purposes. The said property forms part of the notified Waqf property published in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette dated 06.07.2006 under Serial No.26680.

ii) The Respondent authorities, without issuing any notice under Section 91 of the Waqf Act, 1995 and without following due process of law, are attempting to encroach upon and take away a portion of the graveyard land for laying a road, inspite of objections and representation submitted by the Petitioner Committee. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

DI SCUSSI ON AND CONCLUSI ON:

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner mainly puts-forth the follow ing submissions:-

4.1 The subject property is a graveyard attached to the UPS School and abutting the main road (Bhoothpur to Mahabubnagar) at Amistapur Village, Bhoothpur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, which has been in existence for more than 150 years and has been continuously used by the Muslim community for burial purposes.

4.2 The said graveyard is being used by about 500 Muslim families, comprising around 1,200 members residing in the locality, and contains numerous ancestral graves, thereby having immense religious, cultural, and emotional significance.

4.3 The respondent authorities, without issuing any notice or following due process of law, are attempting to lay a road by tak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top