SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 17137

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Sujana, J
Prabhakar Mallepula – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.495 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.V.V.Vedantha Charya
For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor

The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application for travel abroad specifying exact dates and providing necessary documentation, directing the trial court to dispose of the application accordingly.

Headnote:The petitioner, an accused in a criminal case, sought permission to travel abroad for professional purposes under Section 10(c) of the Passport Act and Section 104 of Cr.P.C. The trial court had dismissed the application. The court noted that the travel was required by the petitioner's employer and was not for personal reasons. The court examined whether the travel would impede the proceedings in the trial court. It was reasoned that the petitioner should provide specific dates and necessary supporting documentation to the trial court to facilitate a proper decision on the request. the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.

Table of Content
1. accused seeking travel permission for professional reasons. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. requirement of specific dates and documentation for travel permission. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner- accused No.10 aggrieved by the order, dated 19.01.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.38 of 2025 in C.C.No.198 of 2021 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Alair, whereunder and whereby, the petitioner filed an application under Section 10 (c) of the Passport Act and 104 of Cr.P.C. seeking permission to travel abroad on the specified dates described in the petition, was dismissed.

2. Heard Sri K.V.V.Vedantha Charya, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an employee of VST Tillers and Tractors. The petitioner being employee of the said company travelling abroad with the company instructions and not for personal works, as such travelling will not affect the proceedings C.C.No.198 of 2021. He further submits that the petitioner after filing necessary documents and permission, sought permission to travel abroad for limited period and he also issued travel schedule, but the learned trial Court dismissed the petition erroneously and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned order.

4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to file fresh application before the learned trial Court for the specific dates particularly for 8 dates i.e., 02.08.2026 to 10.08.2026 with all permissions and also necessary documents, as observed by the learned trial Court in the impugned order. On filing of such application, the learned trial Court is directed to dispose of the said application.

5. With the above observation, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top