IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
CA Bhumik Sarda – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER:
The petitioner is a Chartered Accountant, enrolled on 08.06.2017 under Membership No. 242569 with the ICAI. A complaint dated 10.11.2019 was filed by the 5threspondent before the disciplinary authorities of ICAI, alleging irregularities in the petitioner’s audit of M/s Muppa Green Grandeur Welfare Association, a not-for-profit flat owners’ association. The petitioner asserts that the complainant lacked locus standi, as he was neither a member of the association nor properly authorized, claiming only—without proof—that his son and daughter-in-law were members who had empowered him to act. Upon receiving notice of this complaint, the petitioner submitted a detailed reply on 02.01.2020, addressing each allegation and asserting that no professional misconduct had occurred. Despite this, the disciplinary authority formed a prima facie opinion on 21.08.2020 holding that certain allegations fell within Items (6), (7), and (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule of the Act, thereby concluding that the petitioner was prima facie guilty.
1.1. Subsequently, a notice dated 10.12.2020, received on 15.12.2020, required the petitioner to submit a written statement within 14 days, which he did
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.