SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 17479

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Sri. S.S.R.Anjaneyulu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 15439/2026



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION Nos.15524, 15489, 15839 of 2026 DATED: 05th MAY, 2026 W.P Nos.15524 & 15489 of 2026 Between Mahaveer Educational Society, Represented by its Secretary and another ...Petitioners W.P No. 15839 of 2026 Stanley College of Engineering & Technology for Women, Represented by its Secretary/Correspondent ...Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary and four others ...Respondents

COMMON ORDER

The Writ Petition No.15524 of 2026 is filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:

“may issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring GO Ms. No. 6 dt. 04.03.2026 issued by the 1St respondent notifying a fee of Rs 45,000/ per student per annum in respect of the under-graduate engineering courses imparted by the petitioner for the block period 2025-26 to 2027-28 purportedly on the recommendations of the 2nd respondent as ultra vires, arbitrary and illegal, vitiated by perversity and irrational conclusions of the 2nd respondent, being in violation of the law declared by the Honble Supreme Court and this Hon’’ble Court apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions to the respondents to notify the fee at Rs 75,000/ per student per annum as proposed by the petitioner in its proposal dt.19.12.2024 for the undergraduate engineering courses for the block period

2025-26 to 2027-28.”

2. The Writ Petition No.15489 of 2026 is filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:

“…For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is humbly prayed that this Honorable may issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring GO Ms. No. 6 dt. 04.03.2026 issued by the 1St respondent notifying a fee of Rs.45,000/ per student per annum in respect of the under-graduate engineering courses imparted by the petitioner for the block period 2025-26 to 2027-28 purportedly on the recommendations of the 2nd respondent as ultra vires, arbitrary and illegal, vitiated by perversity and irrational conclusions of the 2nd respondent being in violation of the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions to the respondents to notify the fee at Rs. 75.000/-, per student per annum as proposed by the petitioner in its proposal dt.19.12.2024 for the undergraduate engineering courses for the block period

2025-26 to 2027-28 and pass…”

3. The Writ Petition No.15839 of 2026 is filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:

“…For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is humbly prayed that this Honorable Court issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring GO.Ms. No. 6 dt. 04.03.2026 issued by the 1St respondent notifying a fee of Rs.85,000/- per student per annum in respect of the under-graduate engineering course (B.E/B.Tech) imparted by the petitioner for the block period 2025-26 to 2027-28 purportedly on the recommendations of the 2nd respondent as ultra vires, arbitrary and illegal, vitiated by perversity and irrational conclusions of the 2nd respondent, being in violation of the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court, being violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the constitution and issue consequential directions to the respondents to notify the fee at Rs.1,15,000/-, per student per annum as proposed by the petitioner in its proposal for the undergraduate engineering course (B.E/B.Tech) for the block period 2025-26 to 2027-28 and pass….”

4. Heard Sri S.Sri Ram, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Vinay Krishna Kodali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education, Sri G. Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned Standing Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top