IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO DATE: 17.04.2026 Between:

K.V.R. Murthy and others …. Petitioners and The State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Aministration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another …. Respondents

ORDER:

Heard Sri Anil Komi Reddy, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Krishna Reddy Putta, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed declaring the action of the 2^nd respondent in issuing final Notice No.R.O./1140/2013, dated 07/09.11.2015, as arbitrary and illegal and consequently quash the same by directing respondent No.2 to renew the lease in terms of the earlier lease deed, on such terms and conditions as respondent No.2 fixes in accordance with law, and to pass such other order or orders.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that respondent No.2 has constructed a shopping complex, by namely ‘IDMST Municipal Complex’, at Old Bus Stand area, Wanaparthy, wherein the 1st petitioner educational institution had taken on lease shops bearing Municipal Nos.C-1 to C-4 halls, on a monthly r