IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Goppannagari Rukum Bai and ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
The Depot Manager and another – Respondent
MACMA 1666/2019
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
M.A.C.M.A.No.1666 of 2019
DATE: 05.05.2026
Between:
Goppannagari Rukum Bai and another.
….. Appellants
AND
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., (presently TSRTC),
Medak Depot and another.
….Respondents
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the appellants/claimants challenging the
award and decree dated 27.08.2015 passed in M.V.O.P.No.204 of
2014 by the Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-
Judge, Family Court-cum- VII Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Medak at Sangareddy (for short, “the Tribunal”), whereby the Tribunal
granted compensation of Rs.7,45,000/- with interest at 7.5% per
annum from the date of petition till the date of depositing the amount
as against the claim of Rs.10,00,000/- for the death of one Mohan
Reddy (hereinafter referred as “the deceased”) in a motor vehicle
accident.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 26.10.2012, the deceased
proceeded to Medak to attend his personal work and at about 03.00
##PAGE2##2
P.M., he was coming back in an auto bearing No.AP-23-TV-6149
which was proceeding towards Haveli Ghanapur village from Medak
Town and when the auto reached the place of accident near Gandhi
Nagar area, the RTC bus bearing No.AP-26-Z-0019 (hereinafter
referred as “crime vehicle”) coming in opposite direction and the driver
of the crime vehicle drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner
dashed the auto as a result, the deceased and other passengers
travelling in the auto sustained injuries and the deceased immediately
shifted to Government Hospital, Medak to save his life. On the advice
of the Doctors while taking to Hyderabad in 108 Ambulance and when
the ambulance reached old bus stand, Medak, the deceased died at
about 06.00 P.M. The Police of Medak Town registered a case in
Crime No.158 of 2012 for the offences under Sections 337 and 304-A
of IPC., and after completion of investigation, laid charge sheet against
the driver of the crime vehicle. The claimants filed the aforesaid claim
petition seeking compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for the death of the
deceased. The Tribunal upon evaluating the oral and documentary
evidence held that the accident occurred solely due to the rash and
negligent driving of the driver of the crime bus and awarded an
amount of Rs.7,45,000/- to the claimants. Aggrieved by the same, the
appellants-claimants preferred the present appeal.
3. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for both sides
and perused the record.
##PAGE3##3
4. As seen from the material on record, the Tribunal, relying on
Ex.A.2-charge sheet and evidence of P.W.2-eyewitness held that the
accident occurred solely due to the rash and negligent driving by the
driver of the offending bus. This finding of the Tribunal is based on a
proper appreciation of evidence. There is no dispute with regard to the
said finding in this appeal.
5. Regarding the quantum of compensation, though it was claimed
that the deceased was aged about 48 years and was earning
Rs.6,000/- per month from milk business and Rs.12,000/- per month
from coolie work, totaling Rs.18,000/- per month, and that P.W.3 also
deposed that the deceased was earning Rs.20,000/- per month from
such avocations, the Tribunal did not accept the said contention in
the absence of cogent evidence. The Tribunal observed that the
deceased was not on fixed wages nor could be strictly treated as self-
employed, and therefore reasonably fixed the monthly income at
Rs.5,000/-. Accordingly, the annual income was computed at
Rs.60,000/- (Rs.5,000/- × 12). Further, placing reliance on the
judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Sarla Verma and Ors. v.
Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 ACJ 1298, and considering that the dependents
are two in number, the Tribunal deducted 1/3rd towards personal
and living expenses of the deceased, thereby arriving at the annual
contribution to the family at Rs.40,000/-. As the deceased was aged
##PAGE4##4
about 48 years, the Tribunal applied the appropriate multiplier
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.