Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T.Madhavi Devi, G.M.Mohiuddin, JJ
Trufa Enterprise Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Peddi Sudershan Reddy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts leading to the writ appeal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. summary of parties' arguments regarding locus standi and judicial authority. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. court's reasoning on binding nature of precedent and limitations of writ jurisdiction. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.M.Mohiuddin)
2. The present Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent , assailing the order dated 01.05.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.40073 of 2025. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge, while disposing of the underlying writ petition, directed the respondent No.5 to conduct a detailed enquiry into the tender process relating to the supply of bunker beds to Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalayas (KGBVs) and further ordered that the interim order dated 23.01.2026 shall continue to remain in force pending such enquiry. The appellants, being the successful bidders (L1 and L2) as well as the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), were aggrieved by the said order, as it effectively nullifies the earlier b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
