2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 17789
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
Eddula Balaiah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 16691/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN
WRIT PETITION No.16691 of 2026
DATED: 21.05.2026
Between:
Eddula Balaiah
... Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Energy Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad & 4 others
... Respondents
ORDER:
Heard Mr. Kasireddy Jagathpal Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner; Mr.N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TSSPDCL
appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 5.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the direction of this
Court in W.P.No.27276 of 2022 dated 22.07.2022, it would redress the
grievance of the petitioner if the respondent No.3 be directed to comply with the
direction of the Court in the said Writ Petition.
3. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 5
submits that for providing a fresh electricity meter to the house of the petitioner,
##PAGE2##2
the payment of outstanding dues of the petitioner is one requirement and another
requirement would be to make a formal fresh application for the fresh electricity
meter to the house of the petitioner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel also submits that the petitioner is not able to
show the making of the fresh application seeking installation of the fresh
electricity meter as directed by this Court in the order dated 22.07.2022.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further draws the attention of this Court
to a letter addressed by the office of the Law Attache to the Superintending
Engineer dated 18.04.2026, and particularly draws the attention of this Court to
paras 3, 3.1, 3.2, 4 and 5 of the correspondence between office of the Law
Attache and the Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd.
Learned counsel relies upon the said correspondence between the office of the
Law Attache and the Superintending Engineer to show that even according to
the Department, the pendency of the title dispute in respect of the subject
premises in O.S.No.3067 of 2019 on the file of learned IX Junior Civil Judge,
City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is the ground for failure to provide electricity
connection and not the failure to make a fresh application for fresh electricity
meter connection.
6. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the
petitioner shall make a fresh application together with the requisite fee duly
enclosing all requisite annexures to the concerned authority for a fresh
##PAGE3##3
electricity meter to the premises. Upon such application being made, the
respondent Nos.2 to 5 shall take necessary steps to process the application as
expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) weeks from the
date the application is made.
7. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be
no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________
JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Date: 21.05.2026
KRL