ORDER:

Heard Sri Sarat Chandra Sivalenka, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Ms. Racharla Sowmya Rani, learned counsel representing Sri Nageswar Rao Pujari, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. Perused the material available on the record.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the petitioners aggrieved by the order dated 02.08.2022 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by the learned XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A.No.1044 of 2022 in O.S.No.124 of 2015. By the Impugned Order, the learned Trial Court dismissed the petitioners’ application filed under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act read with Section 151 of the C.P.C seeking permission to mark a photocopy of the Family Settlement Deed dated 06.11.2000 as secondary Evidence.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as per their status before the learned Trial Court.

I. BRIEF FACTS

4. The factual backdrop to the present revision as borne out from the record, is as follows:

(a) The case originates from O.S.No.151 of 2019 filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners seeking partition and separate possession of the suit sched