ORDER:

Heard, K. Lingam Goud, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and V. Venkat Ram Narsaiah, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. Perused the material available on the record.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 30.06.2023 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Jayashankar Bhupalapally in I.A No. 62 of 2023 in O.S. No. 127 of 2022. By the impugned order, the learned Trial Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner/defendant No.2 under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act r/w. Section 151 of the C.P.C., to send the promissory notes, dated 20.11.2011 and 06.01.2010 i.e., Ex. A1 and A2 respectively, to the handwriting expert to compare and ascertain the signatures of petitioner/defendant with her admitted signatures on her Vakalathnama and written statement.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as per their status before the Trial Court.

BRIEF FACTS

4. The factual backdrop to the present revision is as follows:

a) The respondent/plaintiff instituted suit vide O.S.No.91/2012 on the file of learned Principal D