2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 17972
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
P NARSING RAO HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
COMMR GHMC HYDERAAD AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
WP 6768/2013
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION No.6768 of 2013
DATE: 23.04.2026
Between:
Mr.P. Narsing Rao
…Petitioner
AND
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,
Rep. by its Commissioner,
Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad & others.
…Respondents
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more
particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the
action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not considering the
representation dated 27.02.2013 for taking action against the 3rd
and 4th respondents for illegal erection of hoarding for
advertisement by encroaching 30’ wide public road opposite to
Pochamma Temple, Hanuman Nagar, Chaitanyapuri. Hyderabad
and trying to obtain permission, as arbitrary, illegal and contrary
to the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Act,1955 and to pass such other order or orders…”
2. Heard Mr. V. Venkata Subramanyam, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Mr. Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, learned
##PAGE2##2
Standing Counsel for GHMC, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Perused the record.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned
Standing Counsel would contend that action has already been
taken and the illegal hoardings have been removed, including
clearing of the public encroachment over the 35 feet road.
4. In that view of the matter, as the grievance of the
petitioner is stated to have been redressed, no further cause
survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. However, liberty
is granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum,
if there are any subsequent developments causing grievance to
the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand
closed.
_________________________________
SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J
Date: 23.04.2026
ds
##PAGE3##3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION No.6768 of 2013
Date: 23.04.2026
ds