JUDGMENT

(Per Hon’ble Justice B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO)

1. This Memorandum of appeal is filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 assailing the order passed by the learned XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, in I.A.No.928 of 2014 in O.S.No.645 of 2007 dated 22.12.2025.

2. Appellants are the respondents-defendants and sole respondent is the petitioner-plaintiff in I.A.No.928 of 2014 in O.S.No.645 of 2007.

3. For the sake of convenience, parties will be herein after referred to as appellants-defendants and respondent-plaintiff.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants - defendants submits that the learned Trial Court ought to have considered the objections filed by the appellants-defendants on 09.04.2025 to the advocate commissioner report dated 17.03.2025, wherein they stated that they raised objections with regard to illegalities in executing the commission warrant and also the absence of the appellants-defendants on 16.02.2025 when B and C schedule properties were recorded. The learned Trial Court failed to consider that the signature of the surveyor in the final report filed by the advocate commissioner is different from the surveyor whose name appears i