Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty, J
V.Yashoda – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background involving revenue recovery proceedings against ancestral property for deceased's misappropriation. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. contentions regarding the nature of property liability for ancestral debt. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 18) |
| 3. legal hierarchy and liability of legal heirs for ancestral debts under hindu law. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 4. dismissal of the challenge to the recovery proceedings. (Para 20) |
COMMON ORDER:
W.P.No.835 of 2018 is filed to declare the Orders passed by respondent No.2/District Collector, Kamareddy District, vide file No.D3/302/2017, dated 08.12.2017, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 16 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently, to set aside the notice of attachment issued by the Tahsildar, Nagireddypet Mandal, Kamareddy District, vide proceedings No.A2/200/2011, dated 06.01.2014.
W.P.No.12155 of 2020 is filed to declare the Form No.1/Distraint Order under Section 8 issued by the Mandal Girdawar, Nagireddypet Mandal, Kamareddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and for consequential relief.
3. Heard Sri Ashok Reddy
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
