ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not mutating her name in the revenue records in respect of land admeasuring Ac.0 – 39 gts in Sy.No.549/AA, situated at Chepyal Village, Mirdoddi Mandal, Siddipet District (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject property’) and incorporating the name of respondent No.5 in the latest pahani and 1-B namuna from the month of July, 2019, as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential relief.

2. Heard Sri Shyam S.Agarwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri Mohd.Asifuddin, learned Counsel for respondent No.5.

3. Brief facts of the case as averred in the writ affidavit are that originally, one Dammu Rama Goud, was the owner and possessor of the subject property and his name was also reflected in the pahanies till 2015; that after the death of Rama Goud, his wife namely Dammu Rajavva, inherited the subject property and Fauti Virasat Patta was issued in her favour vide proceedings No.B/1024/2015, dated 31.05.2015 and her name was also reflected in the revenue records and further title deeds have also been issued to her; that basing on the said documents, petitioner purchased the subject property from Dammu Rajavva under registered sale deed No.794 of 2015, dated 07.04.2015 and submitted an application dated 15.12.2015, to respondent No.3, for mutation of her name in the revenue records and also for issuance of E-Pattadar Passbook. However, respondent No.5 claiming the subject property on the basis of fabricated unregistered sale deeds dated 25.08.1983, 10.06.2001 and 22.02.2014, filed an application before respondent No.4 in the month of June, 2016 in Prajavani, to mutate his name in the revenue records; that respondent No.4 made enquiry and vide memo No.B/123/2017, dated 18.04.2017, rejected the claim of respondent No.5 and directed to approach the proper forum. Aggrieved by the same, respondent No.5 filed an appeal vide No.D/1673/2017, dated 04.12.2017, and the same was dismissed by respondent No.3, directing the respondent No.5 to approach Civil Court for redressal of grievance; that respondent No.5 made attempts to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject property; that petitioner lodged complaint with the Police, Dubbaka and Police, Mirdoddi and a case was registered in Mirdoddi Police Station against respondent No.5; that petitioner filed a suit vide O.S.No.36 of 2019, on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet, for injunction and the same is pending adjudication.

4. While the matter stood thus, respondent No.3 entered the name of respondent No.5 in the revenue records i.e., latest pahanies and 1-B namuna from July, 2019, illegally by ignoring and overcoming the Order of respondent No.4 dated 18.04.2017, by deleting the name of petitioner’s vendor without any notice to the petitioner; that petitioner submitted a representation to respondent Nos.2 and 4 on 15.07.2019; that respondent No.2 made endorsement to examine and verify the record and take action, but the respondent No.4 is continuing the said illegal entries; that petitioner submitted another representation to respondent No.2 on 22.07.2019, but respondent Nos.2 and 4 have not taken any action. Aggrieved by the same, present writ petition is filed.

5. Counter has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 stating that as per the revenue records, the name of Dammu Rama Goud was recorded as pattadar in respect of subject property and after his death, succession was granted in favour of his wife Dammu Rajavva through proceedings No.B/1024/2015, dated 31.03.2015; that the original pattadar, during his life time alienated the subject property in favour of T.Ramulu, under simple sale deed dated 25.06.1983, who in turn alienated the same to K.Mallaiah, under simple sale deed dated 10.06.2001 and the said K.Mallaiah, alienated the subject property in favour of respondent No.5, through simple sale deed dated 22.