SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 18073

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
The State of A.P. – Appellant
Versus
Smt Shantha Bai – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This Appeal is filed by the appellants under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, being aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree, dated 15.09.2006 passed in O.S.No.210 of 2002 on the file of the learned IX Additional Chief Court, City Civil Court (Fast Track Court), Hyderabad.

2. Heard learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the appellants and Smt. Manjari S.Ganu, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the entire material on record.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as, as they are arrayed before the Trial Court.

4. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs filed OS No.210 of 2002 seeking declaration of title and consequential injunction with respect to suit schedule property restraining the defendants therein from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession. The contentions of the plaintiffs in the said suit are that the suit schedule property was gifted to the plaintiff’s husband under Ex.A26. Pursuant to the said gift deed, the plaintiff’s husband has become the absolute owner and that ever since the execution of the said gift deed, her husband has been in possession of the suit schedule propert

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top