IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
The State of A.P. – Appellant
Versus
Smt Shantha Bai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Appeal is filed by the appellants under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, being aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree, dated 15.09.2006 passed in O.S.No.210 of 2002 on the file of the learned IX Additional Chief Court, City Civil Court (Fast Track Court), Hyderabad.
2. Heard learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the appellants and Smt. Manjari S.Ganu, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the entire material on record.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as, as they are arrayed before the Trial Court.
4. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs filed OS No.210 of 2002 seeking declaration of title and consequential injunction with respect to suit schedule property restraining the defendants therein from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession. The contentions of the plaintiffs in the said suit are that the suit schedule property was gifted to the plaintiff’s husband under Ex.A26. Pursuant to the said gift deed, the plaintiff’s husband has become the absolute owner and that ever since the execution of the said gift deed, her husband has been in possession of the suit schedule propert
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.