Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Narsing Rao Nandikonda, J
Mohammed Samad Shareef – Appellant
Versus
Mahender Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition for revision of an eviction order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. summary of claim petitioner's contentions regarding independent occupancy. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. summary of respondents' denials and assertion of existing tenancy. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. analysis of the trial court's dismissal due to lack of evidence. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 5. court evaluates the lack of jural relationship proofs. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 6. final confirmation of dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 58 , 59) |
O R D E R
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 22 of the Rent Controller Act, 1960 aggrieved by the order dated 21.12.2020 in E.A.No.22 of 2011 in E.P.No.7 of 2011 in R.C.No.423 of 2007 on the file of the learned I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad.
2. Heard Sri Vedula Venkatarama, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Sridhar, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri J. Prabhakar, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Aadesh Verma, learn
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
