Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy, J
Sunil Pershad – Appellant
Versus
Harimaran Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the background, findings, and the appeal context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. legal determination regarding evidence for disability claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's discretion in assessing lump sum compensation and interest rates. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. final orders and disposal of the appeal. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT:
1. The present appeal calls in question the correctness of the award dated 11.04.2001 passed by the learned II Member Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings – cum -VII (Addl. Chief Judge), City Civil Court, Hyderabad -cum - Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunal in O.P. No.1514 of 1996, whereby the claim petition filed by the claimant came to be partly allowed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they were arrayed before the Tribunal.
3. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the present appeal are that the claimant filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Rule 455 of Andhra Pradesh motor vehicles rules 1989 r/w. section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- from respondent Nos.1 to 3, who are driver, own
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
