Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy, J
Dundigalla Bhargavi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of petitioner claims regarding legality of land acquisition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. response of state authorities regarding statutory compliance and exemption. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. interpretation of public purpose and the validity of s. 10-a exemptions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final determination on procedural validity and recourse for individual grievances. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner herein, with the following prayer:
“….to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Notification issued under Section 11 of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as amended Act No.30 of 2013 calling objections for the proposed acquisition of 50 houses of the petitioners as described in the cause title having total extent 6140.11 sq. yards for the purpose of beautification of thousand pillar temple by exempting 10-A of the Act No.30 of 2013 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Article 300-A of the Con
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
