SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 18135

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
Inumula Buchaiah – Appellant
Versus
Kashetti Madhukar – Respondent


ORDER:

Heard Sri K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Kothapalli Sai Harsha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and perused the record. Despite service of notice, there is no representation for the respondents.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the petitioners being aggrieved by the order dated 10.08.2023 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Mancherial in C.M.A. No.23 of 2021, whereby the learned Appellate Court reversed the order dated 18.10.2021 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Chennur in I.A. No. 189 of 2021 in O.S. No. 48 of 2021, wherein the injunction sought by the petitioner was refused.

I. BRIEF FACTS

3. The factual backdrop to the present revision is as follows:

4. The respondents/plaintiffs instituted a suit vide O.S. No.48 of 2021 seeking the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of suit schedule properties, asserting title and possession through a chain of documents commencing from a simple sale deed dated 24.02.1999 allegedly executed by petitioner no. 1/defendant no.1 in favour of their father Kashetti Rajanna. Simultaneously, the respondents/plainti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top