SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 18141

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
Gaddam Ramulamma – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Gaddam Indira – Respondent


Heard Sri C. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Gulam Asghar Hussain Khan, learned counsel representing Sri Shiva Kumar Manchena learned counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the material available on record.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the petitioners aggrieved by the order dated 04.12.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “impugned order”) passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, R.R. District, at L.B. Nagar in I.A.Nos.680 of 2023 in A.S.Sr. No.1117 of 2023. By the impugned order, the learned appellate court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 341 days in filing of an appeal against the preliminary decree dated 27.04.2022 passed in O.S.No.1089 of 2014 of 2019 on the file of learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R. District, at L.B. Nagar.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as per their status before the learned appellate court.

I. BRIEF FACTS

4. The factual backdrop to the present revision is as follows:

a) The lis between the parties originates from O.S. No. 1089 of 2014, instituted by Respondent No.1/pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top