Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 18223
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION No.5405 OF 2020
DATE : 11.06.2026
Between:
Janampalli Anirudh Reddy
…Petitioner
AND
State of Telangana & Others
…Respondents
Key Points:- (!) The document identifies the case title: Janampalli Anirudh Reddy – Appellant vs The State of Telangana – Respondent, WP 5405/2020. (!) - (!) The decision is pronounced by The Hon'ble Justice N.Tukaramji. (!) - (!) The decision relates to a writ petition filed in the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (!) - (!) The decision was made on 11-06-2026. (!) - (!) The document provides the case caption and docket but does not include detailed judgment content within the provided text. (!)
How to challenge the State of Telangana in a WP 5405/2020 proceeding in the Telangana High Court?What is the scope of appellate relief available in Janampalli Anirudh Reddy v.The State of Telangana?What are the rights of the appellant in a writ petition filed in the Telangana High Court?
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering and disposing of application of the petitioner dated 06.03.2020 for grant of permission for conducting of Paadayatra or Procession from Vallur Village (Jadcherla Mandal Mahabubnagar District) to the District Collectors Office, Mahabubnagar, via Udandapur Khanapur-Karukonda-Myasamma Road-Boyapalli gate, as being illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, contrary to the provisions of Telangana District Police Act, 1329 Fasli and violative of Articles, 14, 19, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the said application and direct to grant permission to the petitioner for conducting of Paadayatra or Procession in accordance with law and pass....”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and, therefore, seeks dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous.
4. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
