Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R. Madhusudhan Rao, J
Ch. Kishore – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Faiyz – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and the grounds for appeal regarding inadequate compensation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. review of the accident's facts, the claimant's disability, and the nature of injuries. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. application of legal principles for quantifying 'just compensation' including future prospects and specific medical needs. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
1. This Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the MV Act’) assailing the order passed by learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum – II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad in MVOP.No.1424 of 2016 dated 28.04.2018.
2. Appellant is the petitioner and respondents are the respondents in MVOP.No.1424 of 2016.
3. Notice got issued to respondent No.1 in the appeal is served but none appeared for him.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant – petitioner submits that the learned Tribunal has wrongly taken the earnings of the appellant - petitioner on lower side, wrongly fixed the income at Rs.3,000/- per month without any basis and awarded less compensation to the appellant - petitioner under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
