Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J
Reddy’s Laboratories Limited – Appellant
Versus
Competition Commission of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of petitioner's pharmaceutical business and procedural history of the competition commission investigation. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondents' claims regarding the statutory authority to investigate and procedural necessity of financial disclosures. (Para 2) |
| 3. interim procedural orders remain non-adjudicatory and outside writ jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. distinction and inapplicability of precedents to premature judicial intervention. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. merits of coercive conduct and prior exonerations are for the commission to decide. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. procedural irregularities, delay, and composition defects do not invalidate ongoing statutory inquiries. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. dismissal of petition with liberty to raise merits before the commission. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
O R D E R:
Petitioner is a renowned pharmaceutical company engaged in the business of providing Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API), generics, branded generics, biosimilars and over-the-counter pharmaceutical products across the world, and has earned global recognition for providing access to affordabl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
