Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Pulla Karthik, J
Chinna Galireddy Tadi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of writ petition regarding refusal to register property documents. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. statutory obligation of registering authorities to record reasons for refusal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. direction to process documents subject to statutory compliance. (Para 7) |
O R D E R :
With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.
2. This writ petition is filed declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in not receiving, registering and releasing the sale deed presented by the petitioners in respect of property bearing Plot Nos.100 and 101 admeasuring 597.0 sq.yards in Sy.No.52/1 situated at Bachupally village and Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district as arbitrary and illegal.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms.S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
4. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer and submits that respondent No.3 is refusing to register the documents presented by the petitioner in respect of subject property. Therefore, the learned counsel prays this Court to issue suitable directions to the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
