Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J
Rupineni Venkata Krishna Rao – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts and grievances regarding loc enforcement. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments concerning judicial overrides vs administrative executive authority. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court holds that judicial orders regarding travel override executive circular instructions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER:
The petitioner is accused No.5 in FIR No.305 of 2024 of P.S. Jubilee Hills, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 386, 365, 341, and 120-B read with 34 of the IPC, based on a complaint lodged by the defacto complainant in relation to partnership disputes concerning a company named M/s. Kria Health Care. A Look Out Circular (LOC) came to be issued by the 3rd respondent-SHO, P.S. Jubilee Hills, whereupon the respondents No. 1 and 2-Immigration authorities detained the petitioner when he returned to India from USA, and landed at the New Delhi Airport.
1.1. It is the specific case of the petitioner that this Court in W.P. No. 17203 of 2024 dated 04.07.2024, directed that the Look Out Circular (LOC) opened against him should remain suspended during any period for which the XVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad (for short, the trial Court)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
