IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Shaik Fathimunissa Begum – Appellant
Versus
The state of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Sri M. Rathan Singh, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, Sri V. Brahmaiah Chowdary, learned counsel for respondent No.2, Sri Nakka Naveen, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 6 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State.
2. This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the revision petitioner/wife seeking indulgence of the court to interfere with the order passed by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda (for short ‘the Appellate Court”) in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2024 dated 21.02.2025 and to direct disposal of DVC No.31 of 2009 by fixing time limit and to order respondent Nos.3 to 6 not to evict the revision petitioner from the shared household in Plot No.63, Seshadri Nagar, RL Nagar, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri.
3. The petitioner herein is the wife of Khadeer Basha being married to him in the year 1991. Out of wedlock, the petitioner had a daughter and son and thereafter, due to said Khadeer Basha having illegal intimacy with another woman and resorting to harassment, the petitioner filed DVC No.31 of 2009. In said DVC, the respondents who are husband and in-laws of the petitioner have
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.