SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 18421

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty, J
Doma Satish Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Telangana – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.7471 of 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mohd.Razak, Shafath Ahmed Khan
For the Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous when the cause of action submitted by the petitioners no longer exists or the relief sought has been rendered unnecessary.

Headnote:The petitioners approached this court challenging the failure of revenue authorities to implement mutation orders issued under S. 5(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971. The petitioners sought the issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds for their property. The central issue was whether the respondent authorities were obligated to enforce the pending mutation orders. Upon representation, the counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue had been resolved or was no longer live, as the cause of action in the matter did not survive. The court dismissed the petition as having become infructuous.

Table of Content
1. failure to implement orders under the rights in land act. (Para 1)
2. dismissal of writ petition upon counsel's admission that the matter is infructuous. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

: ORDER :

This writ petition filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in failing to implement the orders passed in Proceedings No. MUT/05/26/01246/2018, dated 24.12.2018, under Section 5(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 , by not effecting mutation in the revenue records and by not issuing Pattadar Passbooks and Title Deeds in the names of the petitioners in respect of their ancestral lands admeasuring Ac. 0.16 guntas in Survey No. 252, Ac. 0.27 guntas in Survey No. 253, and Ac. 0.14 guntas in Survey No. 255, situated at Chandradhana Village, Talakondapalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential relief.

2. Sri Mohd.Razak, learned counsel representing Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, are present.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.

4. Recording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top