IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Konda Hemanth Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana represented by its Public Prosecutor & another – Respondent
COMMON ORDER ON REFERENCE:
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K. Lakshman)
1. The present batch of criminal petitions has been placed before this Division Bench by the then Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice, pursuant to the order dated 09.06.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in CRLP No. 2767 of 2025 and batch [hereinafter “reference order”].
2. Seeking clarification regarding the applicability of Section 370A (2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereinafter “IPC”] to customers of a sex worker, the learned Single Judge had referred the following questions to be decided:
“i. Whether mere presence in such premises, without evidence of specific acts of exploitation or management, is sufficient to constitute an offence under the said provisions?
ii. Whether the customer in Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 can be prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 370-A (2) of the IPC?”
3. Before dealing with the questions to be decided in the present reference, we deem it appropriate to discuss the background and the reference order passed by the learned Single Judge.
4. The Petitioners herein, allegedly, are the “customers” or clients of sex workers. Some of them claim to be merely present
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.