2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 19177
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V. Venugopal, J
Bonjour Wellness Spa – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.17995 of 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Revelli Ramanjaneyulu
For the Respondents: M. Srinivas
Wellness centers may operate subject to maintaining customer records and adhering to transparency guidelines to prevent immoral activities, while remaining compliant with statutory municipal and tax regulations.
Headnote:The petitioner, operating a beauty and wellness spa, challenged the interference of police officials and the SOT under notification No. (L&O) M4/3140/2010, alleging it as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The petitioner contended that they were adhering to the guidelines established by the Court in W.P. No. 16281 of 2010, yet officials were insisting on a specific court order to continue operations. The primary issue was whether the petitioner is entitled to conduct business without a separate court order, provided they adhere to established guidelines. The court observed that while the respondents agreed to follow previous judicial directions, the petitioner must still ensure compliance with municipal and GST laws. In view of the said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to follow the directions issued by this Court in the order dated 28.09.2021 in W.P.No.16281 of 2010 and batch.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to carry on business under art 19(1)(g) subject to reasonable restrictions. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. necessity of statutory licenses (municipal and gst) for lawful business operation. (Para 4) |
| 3. compliance with judicial guidelines as a prerequisite for non-interference by law enforcement. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:-
“….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the action of Respondents Police Officials and Officers of SOT in interfering with lawful business of petitioner shops under the guise of impugned notification No. (L&O) M4/3140/2010, dated 30.06.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent and forcing the petitioners to secure similar orders from this Honourable Court as passed in W. P. No 16281 of 2010 and batch though there is no violation committed by the petitioners in running their SPA Wellness Centre as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and direct the respondents and their officers not to interfere in the day to day business of petitioner shops and grant such other necessary relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Heard Sri Revelli Ramanjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri M. Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents and with their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is engaged in the business of providing solutions for all beauty and wellness needs such as saloon and spa. The petitioner is holding valid registration certificates for running his business in Hyderabad. It is further submitted that the respondents visited the SPA Centre and asked the petitioner whether he has an order from this Court to run the business as this Court had decided similar issues in the order, dated 28.09.2021 in W.P.No.16281 of 2010 and batch, wherein this Court issued the following directions:-
“In view of the submissions of learned counsel for both sides, these Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of order dated 04.02.2021 in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.24410 of 2020, permitting the petitioners to run the massage centres, subject to maintaining a record in the register to be maintained by the massage centres containing the dates of visits of the customers, their names and verifiable addresses together with the phone numbers, so as to enable the police to contact them on the aspect of the request to the owner/manager/operator of the massage centres to provide for the help from the opposite sex. Further, it shall be open to any police officer not below the rank of a Sub-Inspector of Police attached to any police station to verify once in a while such records maintained by the massage centres and he shall also be at liberty to verify as to whether the particular customer has solicited any such special service from the massage centre or not. It is also open to the police to take appropriate action depending upon the result of any such verification and also considering the fact that whether the cross massage service provided to the customers is in professional manner or not. Police are also entitled to investigate into crimes, if any, reported against the petitioners. Petitioners are also directed not to keep the main door of the premises closed, during the working hours. Subject to these conditions, the petitioners may be permitted to carry on the business, duly taking all necessary and proper precautions to ensure that no incident of immoral activity is carried on under the guise of providing whole body massage. Miscellaneous petitions pending in all the Writ petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs”
It is stated th