SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(TRI) 83

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH
Sri Samir Kumar Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

WP(C) 204/2021

Sri Samir Kumar Ghosh

----Petitioner(s)

Versus

The State of Tripura and 3 others

----Respondent(s)

For the Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate

Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. A. Bhaumik, Advocate

Mr. D. Sarma, Additional GA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH

Order

09/01/2023

Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S.

Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr.

D. Sarma, learned Additional GA appearing for the respondents-State and

Mr. A. Bhaumik, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-Agartala

Municipal Corporation (for short “AMC”).

The grievance of the petitioner is that in pursuance of a judgment

passed by a Division Bench of this Court, he was paid gratuity to the ceiling

limit of Rs. 10 lakh in terms of The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. On

computation, the respondents-AMC paid him Rs. 7,18,608/-, but, the

petitioner has filed the present writ petition raising his grievance that his

entire length of service has not been considered in quantifying

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top