2025 Supreme(Online)(Tri) 339
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
Sri Bisweswar Kar Chowdhuri and anr – Appellant
Versus
Sri Shibu Ranjan Banik and anr – Respondent
RSA 3 / 2023
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA RSA No.03 of 2023
1) Sri Bisweswar Kar Chowdhuri, son of Late Jyotsnamoy Kar Chowdhuri
2) Sri Baneswar Kar Chowdhuri, son of Late Jyotsnamoy Kar Chowdhuri both of them are the resident of Village-Sindhuk Pathar, P.O.Manu Bazar, Pin-799143, P.S. Manu Bazar, District-South Tripura ---- Appellant-Defendant (s)
Versus
1) Sri Shibu Ranjan Banik, son of Late Suresh Chandra Banik, a resident of Village-Guachand, P.O. & P.S. Manu Bazar, District-South Tripura ----Principal Respondent/Plaintiff(s)
2) Sri Ratneswar Kar Chowdhuri, son of Lt. Jyotsnamoy Kar Chowdhuri, a resident of Village-Sindhuk Pathar, P.O. & P.S. Manu Bazar, District-South Tripura ----Defendant No.3/Pro-Respondent(s)
[-
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant (s) : Mr. P.K. Dhar Sr. Adv.
Mr. R. Debnath, Adv. Mrs. Priya Saha, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. T.D. Majumder, Sr. Adv.
Ms. R. Debbarma, Adv.
Date of Hearing : 20.01.2025 Date of Judgment & Order : 29.01.2025 Whether fit for reporting : YES _________________________________________________________
HON‟BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT Judgment & Order This appeal is directed challenging the judgment and decree dated
24.11.2022 delivered by Learned Additional District Judge, South Tripura, Sabroom in connection with Case No.T.A.01 of 2022. By the said judgment and decree, Learned First Appellate Court has reversed the finding of the Learned Trial Court in respect of land as mentioned in Schedule-C of the plaint in (2)
connection with Case No.T.S.08 of 2014 and the judgment was delivered by Learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Belonia, South Tripura on 05.05.2018.
[2] Heard Mr. P.K. Dhar, Learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. R. Debnath, Learned counsel and Mrs. Priya Saha, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-defendants and also heard Mr. T.D. Majumder, Learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. R. Debbarma, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-plaintiff.
[3] However, before proceeding with the merit of the appeal, let us discuss about the subject matter of dispute among the rival parties for which the present appeal under Section 100 of CPC is filed before this High Court. The respondent-plaintiff filed one suit before the Court of Learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, South Tripura, Belonia seeking decree for declaration of right, title and interest over the land as mentioned in Schedule-A of the plaint along with confirmation of possession and perpetual injunction against the defendant appellants herein from entering into the suit land as mentioned in Schedule-B of the plaint and also for recovery of possession by evicting the defendants i.e. the appellants herein from the land as mentioned in Schedule-C of the plaint. The suit was numbered as T.S.08 of 2018 before the Court of Learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, South Tripura, Belonia. The case of the respondent- plaintiff was in short is that the plaintiff of the original suit purchased the suit land measuring 03 karas 14 dhurs in Sabek C/S plot No.832(P) with specific boundaries by dint of registered Sale Deed vide No.1-1355 dated 08.08.1973 from one Pranbalab Chakraborty and his adjacent plot measuring 0.05 acres from the same owner corresponding to similar old C/S plot No.832(P) by dint of another Sale Deed vide No.1-1227 dated 09.08.1974 and after purchase, possession of both the plots of land were given to the plaintiff-respondent and since then, he had been started possessing the suit land as an absolute lawful owner. In the year 1994 the defendants of the original suit i.e. the appellants herein entered into the land as mentioned in Schedule-C of the plaint as permissive possessor being allowed by the present respondent-plaintiff in order (3)
to run their bamboo business on condition that they would return back or hand over the land as and when asked for by the respondent-plaintiffs. But surprisingly, on 25.01.2009, when the respondent-plaintiff requested the defendants i.e. the app