Back
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
S. Datta Purkaystha, J
Farid Uddin alias Farij Uddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the criminal case and assault details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 25) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural issues and witness integrity. (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 28) |
| 3. court's view on evidentiary standards and witness credibility. (Para 26 , 27 , 29) |
| 4. final judgment and order of conviction confirmation. (Para 30 , 31) |
This revision petition has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 10.04.2025, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar in Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2024, whereby the learned Sessions Judge affirmed the judgment and order of conviction and sentence, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dharmanagar, in Case No. PRC (WP) 130 of 2022, convicting both the convict-petitioners [here-in-after referred to as the ‘petitioners’] for committing offence punishable under Sections 326 /34 of IPC and sentencing them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each, and in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month further.
2. Brief fact of the prosecution case is that the victim, Md. Gyas Uddin, is the son of the petitioner, Farid Uddin and full
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
