HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
Kaizar Dev Barma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura and 4 others – Respondent
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
JUDGMENT & ORDER
Heard learned counsel of both sides.
[2] The petitioner on attaining the age of superannuation retired from service on 31.01.2024 from the post of Additional Director (Industries & Commerce), Department of Industries & Commerce, Government of Tripura. After retirement, he submitted one representation dated 05.02.2024 to the Secretary and Director, Department of Industries & Commerce, Government of Tripura, Agartala, requesting sanction and release of post-retiral benefits to him. When no step was taken, he also submitted another reminder on 13.02.2024 in this regard.
[3] According to the petitioner, on retirement, he became entitled to get Rs.10,00,000 [Rupees Ten lakh] only as full and final settlement of gratuity and the amount payable under Leave Encashment benefit apart from his monthly pension. Thereafter, claiming the same, he submitted a representation on 05.02.2024 seeking the release of such post-retiral benefits and thereafter, his provisional pension amounting to Rs.78,150/- [Seventy Eight thousand One hundred Fifty] only was released for the period w.e.f. 01.02.2024 to 31.07.2024 and the final payment of G
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.