SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tri) 308

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
Kaizar Dev Barma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura and 4 others – Respondent


HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA

JUDGMENT & ORDER

Heard learned counsel of both sides.

[2] The petitioner on attaining the age of superannuation retired from service on 31.01.2024 from the post of Additional Director (Industries & Commerce), Department of Industries & Commerce, Government of Tripura. After retirement, he submitted one representation dated 05.02.2024 to the Secretary and Director, Department of Industries & Commerce, Government of Tripura, Agartala, requesting sanction and release of post-retiral benefits to him. When no step was taken, he also submitted another reminder on 13.02.2024 in this regard.

[3] According to the petitioner, on retirement, he became entitled to get Rs.10,00,000 [Rupees Ten lakh] only as full and final settlement of gratuity and the amount payable under Leave Encashment benefit apart from his monthly pension. Thereafter, claiming the same, he submitted a representation on 05.02.2024 seeking the release of such post-retiral benefits and thereafter, his provisional pension amounting to Rs.78,150/- [Seventy Eight thousand One hundred Fifty] only was released for the period w.e.f. 01.02.2024 to 31.07.2024 and the final payment of G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top