SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tri) 385

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, CJ, Biswajit Palit, J
Gobinda Manik Jamatia – Appellant
Versus
Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council – Respondent
WP(C)(PIL) No.05 of 2026 | WP(C)(PIL) No.07 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P Roy Barman, Kawsik Nath
For the Respondents: Gaurav Kejriwal, Bhaskar Debbarma

Instrumentalities of the State must ensure transparency in recruitment and adhere to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution; appointments made without public advertisement or valid, assented rules are illegal backdoor entries.

Headnote:(A) Public Employment - Recruitment Process - Appointments made without public advertisement, selection process, or adherence to reservation rules are illegal backdoor appointments. (Para 10)

(B) Statutory Rules - Assent of Governor - Rules framed by an Autonomous District Council under the VI Schedule of the Constitution are ineffective without the mandatory assent of the Governor. (Para 5)

(C) Constitutional Mandate - Instrumentality of State - Recruitment in State instrumentalities must be transparent and comply with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. (Para 13, 14)

Issues: Whether the appointments made by TTAADC to Group-C and Group-D posts without following due process and without valid rules are legal.

COMMON ORDER

Heard the counsel for the parties and perused the counter affidavits filed by the respondent No. 1 & 2 in both cases.

The Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council ( for short „TTAADC”) ( respondent no.1) is established under Schedule VI to the Constitution of India for administration of Tribal Areas in the State of Tripura.

It is an instrumentality of State prima facie, and falls within the definition of “State”” under Art.12 of the Constitution of India.

It is the plea of the petitioners in both the cases that the TTAADC has made certain illegal and back door appointments in the Group-C and Group-D posts without following due process, without proper Advertisement and without inviting applications from the eligible candidates and without any selection process on pick and choose basis. This plea is based on certain News Paper reports and disinclination of the Chief Executive officer of the TTAADC to Reply to queries raised by petitioners in WP (PIL) No.5 of 2026 under the Right to Information Act,2005. But appointment orders issued to some of private respondents have been filed as Annexures 5-10 in both Writ Petitions.

In the counter affidavits filed in WP(C)(PIL)No.05/2026, it is admitted in para 8 that though the TTAADC has framed certain rules such as the TTAADC Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 2007, the TTAADC Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 2007, the TTAADC Civil Service (Travelling Allowance) Rules, 2007 and the TTAADC Civil Service (Appointment, Promotion, Conduct and Disciplinary) Rules, 2007 which govern the TTAADC in matters relating to recruitment, service matters, etc., the said Rules have not yet received the assent of His Excellency the Governor till date. Admittedly such assent is mandatory under Section 3 (3) of the VI Schedule and without his assent, they have no effect.

It is stated that the TTAADC has also filed a Writ Petition under Art.32 of the Constitution of India in the Supreme Court of India being W.P.(C) No.88/2026 in that regard, and the Supreme Court has issued notice to the State of Tripura and other respondents on 18.3.2026.

Thus, this statement in para 8 of the counter affidavit of TTAADC proves that there exists no Rules prescribing method of Appointment, Promotion, Conduct and Discipline in the TTAADC, Civil Services.

It is not also disclosed by the TTAADC what posts have been created in the said organisation and what pay scale is to be paid to such posts.

It is further pleaded in para-7 of the counter affidavit filed by Respondent No.1 in WP(C) (PIL) No.05/2026 that the TTAADC administration had regularized certain trained Part-time Workers/Casual Workers/ paid vouchers who are working in different Offices/ DDOs for long time as per decision of the Executive of the TTAADC, which is highest competent authority of TTAADC like the cabinet of the State Government.

It is not disputed that Part-time Workers/Casual Workers/ paid vouchers had been appointed initially without giving adequate publicity by way of public advertisement, without following a prescribed process of selection, and without following of rule of reservation. All such appointment have to be construed as illegal backdoor appointments only.

However they are drawing pay and allowances from the public exchequer as per Art.275 of the Constitution of India and Section 7 of the Schedule VI to the Constitution of India. This cannot be permitted.

We fail to understand, how in the absence of existence of sanctioned posts with approved scale of pay and allowances, the TTAADC could regularize services of above referred persons.

The TTAADC is an instrumentality of the State and is governed by the Constitution and laws of the country which require transparency in the process of recruitment for posts (Art.14) and adherence to rule of reservation ( Art.16) too.

TTAADC cannot give a go-bye to the above Principles of law and regularize services in posts which are possibly not even sanctioned, and make payment out of the public funds

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top