HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
Rasmita Dey on behalf of accd. Balaram Dey – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tripura – Respondent
BA 42/2020
['A BHOWMIK', '', 'Mr R Majumder', 'PP']
Page 1 of 11
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
BA No.42/2020
Smt. Rasmita Dey, wife of Shri Balaram Dey, village: Ratiabari,
PS : Kumarghat, Dist: Unakoti, Tripura
.....................Applicant
On behalf of Shri Balaram Dey, son of late Dulal Dey, village:
Sukanta Nagar, PS: Kumarghat, Unakoti Tripura
.......................Accused
Versus
The State of Tripura
..............Respondent
B_E_F_O_R_E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G CHATTOPADHYAY
For the Applicant(s)
: Mr. A. Bhowmik, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. R. Datta, PP.
Date of Hearing
: 01.05.2020
Date of Order
: 01.05.2020
Order
[1]
This is an application filed under Section 439 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for grant of bail to accused
Balaram Dey who has been arrested on 07.04.2020 in
connection with Pecharthal Police Station case No.2020 PTL 010
for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections
22(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
Act, 1985, herein after referred to as the ’NDPS Act'.
[2]
Smt. Rasmita Dey, wife of the accused, has filed this
application seeking release of her husband on bail and in her
affidavit annexed to the application, she has stated that no
other application for bail in relation to the same matter stands
filed in the High Court or in the Supreme Court.
Page 2 of 11
[3]
The material facts, relevant for disposal of the
matter, briefly stated, are as follows:
On 07.04.2020, following a secret information, police
intercepted the vehicle bearing registration No. NL 01 Q 9390
on the National High Way in front of the Pecharthal Police
Station and after carrying out a search operation inside the
vehicle, recovered a plastic carry bag containing 1000 (One
thousand) Yaba tablets and 51.260 gram Heroine from the
possession of the accused who was found travelling in the
vehicle along with accused driver Md. Jakir Ahamed from
Karimganj in Assam to Kumarghat in Tripura. The contraband
drug was found concealed in the cabin of the vehicle. On
interrogation, none of the accused could offer any explanation in
their defence. Therefore, police seized the contraband drug in
presence of the accused and witnesses and arrested both of the
accused and brought them to police station. On the following
day both of the accused were produced before the learned
Special Judge at Kailashahar in Unakoti Judicial District and
since then they are in custody.
[4]
Mr. Arijit Bhaumik, learned counsel appearing for
accused Balaram Dey has made the following submissions:
(i) Accused is innocent and he has been falsely
implicated in the case.
(ii) Accused is a motor mechanic and he had gone to
Karimganj in Assam on 06.04.2020 i.e the day before
the occurrence for some mechanical work and he
stayed there in the house of one Chanchal Ali on
06.04.2020. As a result of the ban on public
transport due to the ongoing lock down, he boarded
the vehicle of the accused driver Md. Jakir Ahamed
on 07.04.2020 for returning his home at Kumarghat.
(iii) Accused Md. Jakir Ahamed was the driver of the
vehicle and as such the present accused namely,
Page 3 of 11
Balaram Dey did not have any knowledge that there
was contraband in the cabin of the vehicle.
(iv) The entire exercise of search and seizure was
carried out in contravention of the mandatory
provisions of Section 41(2) of the NDPS Act because
the alleged search operation followed by the arrest of
the
accused
was
made
without
warrant
or
authorization as required under Section 41(1) and
the information allegedly received by police prior to
the arrest and search was not taken down into
writing in terms of Section 41(2) of the NDPS Act.
(v) The case has been registered against the accused
in total disregard of the mandatory provisions of
Section 42(1) and (2) of t