Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
KISHAN DEI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners are guarantors for a loan default. (Para 2) |
| 2. writ petition seeks relief against the auction of properties. (Para 3) |
Of f i ce N o t e s, r e p o r t s, o r d e r s o r p r o ce e d i n g s o r d i r e ct i o n s a n d Re g i st r a r ’ s o r d e r w i t h Si g n a t u r e s
COURT’ S OR JUD GE’ S ORD ERS
H W PM S 1 4 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 o n ’ b l e M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J. Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocat e, for t he pet it ioners. Mr. Aj ay Singh Bisht , Advocat e, for t he respondent no. 1. Pet it ioners st ood as guarant ors ( 2) in respect of a loan t aken by respondent no. 2. Since respondent no. 2 has default ed in repaym ent of loan, t herefore, Bank of I ndia has filed an Original Applicat ion under t he Recovery of Debt s and Bankrupt cy Act , 1993 before DRT, Dehradun. Pet it ioners report edly m oved an applicat ion before DRT in t he said proceedings praying t hat Bank of I ndia be rest rained from auct ioning t he propert y belonging t o pet it ioners. DRT has called obj ect ion on t he said applicat ion
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
