Reserved on: 08.04.2025 Delivered on: 08.05.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1675 of 2015 (M/S)

Rajendra Kumar Goel ......Petitioner Vs.

Praveen Kumar and others …..Respondents Presence Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Counsel assisted Mr. Ashis Sinha, learned counsel for respondent no.1.

Mr. G.D. Joshi, learned Counsel, for Respondent No. 3.

Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, learned Counsel for Respondent no. 4.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 24.07.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Haridwar in Original Suit No. 159 of 2009 (Praveen Kumar v. Rajendra Kumar Goel and others), whereby his application under Order IX Rule 7 read with Section 151 CPC was rejected. He further challenges the revisional judgment dated 20.05.2015 passed by the learned Second Additional District Judge, Haridwar in Civil Revision No. 88 of 2013 affirming the aforesaid rejection.

2. The controversy emanates from a registered sale deed dated 28.09.2006 executed by respondent no.5