Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rakesh Thapliyal, J
Geeta Saini – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail considerations with health status. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments against custodial interrogation. (Para 2) |
| 3. bail considerations based on evidence and personal circumstances. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
BA1 No.1046 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
SL. N o .
D a t e
1. Mr. Prakash Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned AAG along with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present applicant–Geeta Saini W/o Himanshu is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 08.02.2025 bearing FIR No. 0071 of 2025, Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun, which was lodged against some unknown person for the offence punishable under Section 140(3), after investigation, the charge-sheet has been filed against four persons, namely, Geeta Saini, Himanshu Kumar, Ajay Saini and Dharam Raj for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 140(1), 140(3), 238(a) read with Section 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in this case, the charge- sheet has been filed against four persons including the present applicant and there is no direct evidence. Apa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
