Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Alok Kumar Verma, J
Suryakant Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking anticipatory bail due to serious allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against the bail application. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. personal liberty concerns under article 21. (Para 7) |
| 4. court's decision on the bail application. (Para 8) |
| 5. conditions laid out for the bail grant. (Para 9) |
Hon’ble Alok Kum ar Verm a,J.
This Application has been filed by the applicant-Suryakant Tyagi seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 505 of 2024, registered at Police Station Kaliyar Sharif, District Haridwar under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 351(2) and Section 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. According to the First Information Report dated 15.12.2024, the applicant took Rs.13,49,000/- from the informant and gave him no objection certificates of the fire police and pollution department. The said no objection certificates were forged.
3. Heard Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, learned Senior Advocate for the applicant, Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent and Mr.
Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the informant.
4. Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate, contended that the applicant is an innocent person. He has been falsely implicated in the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
