SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1281

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Alok Kumar Verma, J
Shahinoor Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.651 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: D.N. Sharma
For the Respondents: Pradeep Lohani, M.C. Kandpal, Devesh Kandpal, Jagdish Chandra Joshi

Anticipatory bail is granted with conditions to prevent flight risk and ensure cooperation in an ongoing investigation.

Headnote:This application seeks anticipatory bail under various provisions including Sections 109, 324(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 25(1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959. The applicant contends false implication, citing no prior convictions and residency. The court directed interim bail subject to conditions to appear for investigation and notify the Court for travel, setting a future hearing date.

Table of Content
1. application filed for anticipatory bail based on serious allegations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. counsel's arguments on implications and presence. (Para 3 , 4 , 6)
3. court's observations on granting interim bail and conditions imposed. (Para 5 , 7)

Hon’ble Alok Kum ar Verm a,J.

The present Application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.68 of 2025, registered at Police Station Kunda, District Udham Singh Nagar under Sections 109 , 324(2), 3(5), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25 (1-B) (a) of the Arms Act, 1959 .

2. As per the First Information Report dated 23.03.2025, on 22.03.2025 at about 5:00 p.m., persons sitting in a car (Scorpio, Registration No.UP37P4751) opened fire on the car (Registration No.UK08TA7686) of the informant. One person was identified whose name is Salman.

3. Heard Mr. D.N. Sharma, learned counsel for applicant, Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for respondent and Mr. M.C. Kandpal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Devesh Kandpal, learned counsel for informant.

4. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder, Advocate and Mr. M.C. Kandpal, learned Senior Advocate, on instructions, have sought three weeks’ time to file objection to the Anticipatory Bail Application.

5. Time is granted.

6. Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He was not present on the spot. He is a permanent resident of District Hapur (Uttar Pradesh), therefore, there is no likelihood of his absconding, and, he is not a convicted person.

7. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, as an ad-interim measure, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant Shahinoor Chaudhary, he shall be released on interim bail on executing a personal bond of Rs.30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/

Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Applicant shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case.

(iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of this Court.

8. List on 28.07.2025 for hearing on the Anticipatory Bail Application.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top